Attendees:
Bob Monkman (Intel)
Alexander Vul (Intel)
Jonas Arndt (HPE)
John Leung (Intel)
Daniel Nilsson (TietoEVRY)
S Bowen
Divya Nettern
Jon Mechling (HPE)
Martin Halstead (HPE)
Joseprabu Inbaraj (AMI)
Marcin Nicpon (TietoEVRY)
Rafal Sztejna (Intel)
Sebastian Scheele (Kubermatic)
Tomas Fredberg (Ericsson)
Proposed Agenda:
- Structure of ODIM project and repository - and where new components like BMC simulator and Composition service would fit- new repos or part of existing ODIM repo?
- Composition Service Proposal
Minutes:
Robust discussion on the structure of the repository v "directory structure". Concern was raised about multiple repositories but came around to agreement on 1 repo for ODIM itself and multiple directories for different components of ODIM.
BMC Simulator is orthogonal and can be its own repository. OK
How to handle Branching.
<TBD> Notes
Topic switch: AMI Composition Proposal
AMI (Jose) sets the stage . Todays goal is to overview what AMI plans to submit in 1-2 months- Proposal phase for discussion
Muthu makes the detailed overview of Composition Service Proposal- (page on wiki) Composition Service
Review of top level APIs (9 APIs) and what their essential purpose is
Q: Attach/Detach resource refers to network connections? Yes, confirmed.
Q: Is AMI aware of and following the WIP DMTF Redfish spec on Composition; Answer: Absolutely.
- AMI will complete the port to the new language and align itself with the Redfish spec once that is ratified.