Attendees | Name | Company |
X | Louis Illuzzi | LFN |
Kenny Paul | LFN | |
Jim Baker | LFN | |
X | Casey Cain | LFN |
X | Jonas Arndt | Red Hat |
William Caban | Red Hat | |
X | Bharath Kumar | HPE |
X | Martin Halstead | HPE |
X | Jon Mechling | HPE |
X | Susan Bowen | HPE |
X | Alex Vul | Intel |
John Leung | Intel | |
Piotr Zedlewski | Intel | |
X | Bob Monkman | Intel |
X | Rafal Sztejna | Intel |
Daniel Nilsson | TietoEVRY | |
X | Marcin Nicpon | TietoEVRY |
X | Muthu Ramalingum | AMI |
Jose Inbaraj | AMI | |
Divya Nettum | AMI | |
Tomas Fredberg | Ericsson |
We could only discuss the DMTF profiles proposal issue.
Redfish implementations can have interop issues. Hence there is a provision for profiles. Introducing profiles in ODIM will help
BMC emulator or any contributed code should adhere to the same.
OCP profiles were created to ensure some degree of interoperability. It specifies H/W and S/W management. ODIM profile is a super set of OCP profile. As OCP is not updated for around 2 years we need to update the same. TietoEvery also agrees there is benefit in having a profile defined for ODIM. AMI also feels it is good to have a profile.
we don't need vote immediately. Let the members go through the proposal and vote the next week.
Not discussed.